← All Verbloom guides
Law School

Verbloom Law School Guides

1L doctrine, explained plainly.

Short, plain-English guides to the first-year concepts students search for most — Civil Procedure (jurisdiction and the Erie doctrine), Torts (negligence and intentional torts), and Contracts (consideration and promissory estoppel) — with the leading cases and tests, grouped by subject.

36 free Law School guides

Civil Procedure

Law SchoolGasperini v. Center for Humanitiescase brief

Gasperini v. Center for Humanities (1996): Case Brief, Erie & Jury Awards, with Video

Gasperini v. Center for Humanities case brief: the facts, the 5–4 holding, how CPLR 5501(c) fits Erie and the Seventh Amendment, both dissents, and an exam hypo.

11 min readRead →
Law SchoolByrd v. Blue Ridgecase brief

Byrd v. Blue Ridge (1958): Case Brief, the Byrd Balancing Test & Video

Byrd v. Blue Ridge case brief: the facts, the holding, Brennan's three-step Erie balancing test, the Seventh Amendment jury interest, and a worked exam hypo.

11 min readRead →
Law SchoolAsahi Metal v. Superior Courtcase brief

Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court (1987): Case Brief, Stream of Commerce & Video

Asahi Metal v. Superior Court case brief: the facts, who joined which opinion, stream of commerce plus vs. pure stream, fairness factors, and a practice hypo.

12 min readRead →
Law SchoolBell Atlantic v. Twomblycase brief

Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly (2007): Case Brief, Plausibility Test & Video

Bell Atlantic v. Twombly case brief: the facts, the 7–2 holding, the plausibility test, Stevens's dissent, Iqbal, and a practice fact pattern with an answer.

12 min readRead →
Law Schoolcivil procedurerelation back

Relation Back of Amendments: Rule 15(c) Explained

Rule 15(c) lets an amended pleading take the date of the original, saving claims that would otherwise be time-barred. Learn the separate tests for new claims and new parties, and why the mistake-of-identity requirement decides most cases.

11 min readRead →
Law Schoolcivil procedureclass actions

Rule 23 Class Actions: The 1L Framework

Class certification is a two-step test: all four Rule 23(a) prerequisites, then one Rule 23(b) category. Commonality after Dukes, predominance, and who gets opt-out rights.

12 min readRead →
Law Schoolcivil procedurediscovery

Discovery Scope and the Work Product Doctrine Explained

Rule 26(b)(1) scope and proportionality, plus how work product differs from attorney-client privilege — including ordinary versus opinion work product.

12 min readRead →
Law Schoolcivil procedurejoinder

Joinder, Impleader, and Intervention: Who Ends Up in One Lawsuit (1L Civ Pro)

The joinder rules decide which claims and parties belong in a single case. A plain-English guide to Rules 18, 20, 19, 14, 13, and 24, with a summary table for 1L Civil Procedure.

11 min readRead →
Law Schoolcivil procedurevenue

Venue, Transfer, and Forum Non Conveniens (1L Civ Pro)

Venue answers which courthouse hears your case — not whether the court has power. Learn 28 U.S.C. § 1391, transfer under § 1404 and § 1406, and forum non conveniens, with a quick decision map.

10 min readRead →
Law Schoolsupplemental jurisdictionsection 1367

Supplemental Jurisdiction Explained: 28 U.S.C. § 1367 (1L Civ Pro)

After diversity and federal-question jurisdiction, § 1367 lets a federal court hear extra claims that couldn't stand on their own. Here's the same-case test, the diversity carve-out, and when a court can decline — with the leading cases.

11 min readRead →
Law Schoolres judicatacollateral estoppel

Res Judicata and Collateral Estoppel: Claim and Issue Preclusion in Civil Procedure

Once a court decides something, that decision has consequences for future litigation. Here's a clear breakdown of claim preclusion (res judicata) and issue preclusion (collateral estoppel) — what they bar, when they apply, and how to distinguish them.

11 min readRead →
Law Schoolsummary judgmentmotion to dismiss

Summary Judgment vs. Motion to Dismiss: Rule 56 vs. Rule 12(b)(6) Explained

Both motions can end a lawsuit before trial — but they operate at different stages and use different standards. Here's a plain-English breakdown of Rule 12(b)(6) and Rule 56, with the key cases every 1L needs to know.

11 min readRead →
Law Schoolplausibility pleading standardTwombly Iqbal

The Plausibility Pleading Standard: Twombly and Iqbal (1L Civ Pro)

Twombly and Iqbal replaced notice pleading with the plausibility standard. Here's a plain-English walkthrough of Rule 8, the two-step Iqbal analysis, and how a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss now works.

10 min readRead →
Law SchoolErie doctrinesubstance vs procedure

The Erie Doctrine Explained: Which Law a Federal Court Applies (1L Civ Pro)

The Erie doctrine decides whether a federal court sitting in diversity applies state or federal law. Here's a plain-English walkthrough of Erie, the substance–procedure line, and the tests from York, Byrd, and Hanna v. Plumer.

11 min readRead →
Law Schoolsubject matter jurisdictiondiversity jurisdiction

Subject-Matter Jurisdiction: Federal Question vs. Diversity (1L Civ Pro)

Can a federal court hear your case? This 1L Civ Pro guide explains subject-matter jurisdiction — federal question and the well-pleaded complaint rule, plus diversity jurisdiction, complete diversity, and the amount in controversy.

10 min readRead →
Law Schoolpersonal jurisdictionminimum contacts

Personal Jurisdiction Explained: Minimum Contacts, Specific vs. General (1L Civ Pro)

Personal jurisdiction is one of the most confusing 1L Civ Pro topics. Here's a plain-English walkthrough of minimum contacts, specific vs. general jurisdiction, purposeful availment, and the fairness test — with the key cases.

11 min readRead →
About·Privacy·Terms·Contact
Featured on FoundrList